Gravitation, Black Holes Jack : 1996 - 2017
Tights	My miserable life in atom continues. First part of the Field research, Drag field, is on Speed of Light page.

Proof for gravitation center, core of the earth, Spring 2017
Fetched with field research Nov 2017 

Black holes are the only known things, which drags all material towards the center. They are the only logical explanations for the existence of gravitational drag. It is well known, that earth's mantle and underlying  lava layer do not have gravitational forces, which would extend over the atom level, into our world. Electric magnet creates invisible drag field to the center of the powered wire loop. 

Possible that Black hole consists from two separate components. Gravity and rotation are based on different materials / fields inside the actual Black hole.

When you look at rotating speeds of the satellites, the ones at lowest altitude rotates earth 8 times a day.  This is possible, when there is center inside the Earth, which empowers the rotation. With faster speed than Earth.

Besides our planets, Sun is known to have gravitational forces. System is quite likely to be the same with other star systems too.

Atoms are known to have similar kind of gravitational forces ... small black holes inside protons and electrons. Chemical compounds are based on atom level rotational forces. They are the best base points for examining qualities of the atom level black holes. And the creation of the artificial gravitation layers.

Drag fields are on Speed of Light page >>

Rotational fields, Nov 10th 2017

Rotational field weakens with distance. Moon's rotation speed is lower than near-by satellites. Same goes with planets. If you draw a straight line from Earth to Moon, near-by satellite does not stay in the same line. Near-by satellites line rolls faster.

It looks like that rotation speed is independent from the size and density, just like it is with free fall in gravitational field. It hints that rotational power-force is transmitted in the same tiny material than drag force.

Rotation misses acceleration, it is exclusive to drag fields. It is not impossible that drag flow would also cause rotation.

Rotation field needs force for keeping the track. Since the rotation comes from the core and rotation is vertical towards the core, the rotational force must hit the side of the item. Then it has to create small force around the item, for keeping the right track.

Rotational force system seems to be fully automated, when you take a satellite to space, it keeps it's track rather well. Moons keep their tracks without any assistance. They do not fall or escape from their tracks. In principle news and movies should be forbidden from satellites, too. In theory satellites act like moons. They never fall or escape from their tracks, like they do in the news and movies.

- - Two centers - -

This would be possible with drag flow. But when drag works, the direction is towards the core. With this it is almost impossible for drag force to rotate the objects too. But on the other hand, drag force should rotate with the system. You can confirm the existence of two forces with heavy, wind tolerant object. You drop it from high altitude on calm night. If the landing point is the same than drop point, drag is separate force. Track follows sum vector of the two different forces.

The sizes of Venus and Earth are the same, gravities are also almost the same. But one day in Venus lasts app 260 Earthly days. If the rotation field is the same than drag field, forces would be equal and the rotation speeds would be equal too.

Magnet which is the another known drag field generator, seems to miss the rotational effect. This talks also against combined drag-rotation cores.

- - Embedded angle - -

Angle with what the rotational field hits the object-atom system is rather stable. It is possible that core sends the outgoing flow with an angle. When it does so, the flow has both X and Y components embedded into it. If the rotational collision is equal to assumed drag collision, the collision turns the angle into track keeping forces and horizontal move. The X-Y components and moves are relative to core / origin. 

If flow goes out with an angle, the distance oriented slow down in rotation speed comes from the smaller energy charge in the flow. Not from curved flow. Track keeping system is not very clear.

The outgoing flow can also have an embedded Z coordinate in it. Z makes the track move in sideways. The movement in sideways is insignificant for the rotation, existence is ignored in the text.

Drag collisions effect area is assumed to be in the back of the object-atom system, so that drag is actually a push towards the center.

- - Tracks shape - -

Elliptical track of planets hints that Sun has two rotational centers or an elliptical rotation center. Ellipse needs two origins. If so, the rotational center do not rotate with Ssun. Another possible answer for elliptical track would be a stable external force, which makes the track elliptical. Third would be shield like system, which manipulates the outgoing flow from the sides. Protons have also elliptical rotation fields.

Earth's and planets' moons and satellites have a round track, so our planets can have only one, un-disturbed, circle-shaped rotational center.

- - Automation - -

One possible explanation for track keeping would be, once again, disturbance in out going flow. Tilted outgoing flow can lock the object-atom system into its track. Create a grip from the object, which resists for example space winds / storms.

Automation could be an application from drags free fall acceleration system : Track keeping force grows and shrinks, when needed. When you try to move farther / nearer the core, the disturbance force grows and fore/background gets stronger very quickly. Rotational field creates and maintains some kind of short tube for the rotated object. Since the one-directional drag effect is missing, rotational disturbance can work in both ways. The maximum track keeping force comes from the strength of flow.

As a result space walks in rotational fields are almost certain to be safer than in movies. Although the drag is missing, the rotational force field keeps you in place, near the spacecraft.

- - Mission Impossible - -

Difficult thing in rotation is that Moon and satellites rotates around Earth and Sun at the same time. This double movement is impossible for our physics. In our physics force can move object into one direction only. Either you rotate around the Sun or around Earth, but force can never move or rotate objects in two directions. Moons have also rotational power.

Unresolved problematic equals to the drag field's flow, which goes out and in at the same time.

There is way, you can make double movement system. When you do that, you have a platform, with what you make the first movement. On the platform you can make the move to second direction.

This hints that Sun's gravitation and rotation are not at the same than Earths. Either one has to work below the other or independently. Since it is easier to do the bigger and wider move before smaller move : Sun's rotational flow creates rotational platform / space for planets rotational fields.

Described physical layer system has a conflict in thread sizes : Threads get smaller, when the system gets bigger and threads get bigger when system gets smaller. At some point thread is bigger than radiator. So it is quite obvious that in reality these layers are either reversed or abstract layers : 
- In abstract layer : The separation system prevents blending in the air, but all forces hits and moves the same objects.
- In reversed layer system : In thread sizes Sun's layer is above Earth's layer.

Moon has a rotational center, but moon does not rotate around it's axle. The missing rotation explains why Moon shows only one face to Earth. These claims creates a conflict. If object has rotational power, the whole system should rotate :
- Moon can rotate around it's own axle with the same speed that Earth. Possible if the centers are made from the same material.
- Moon's mantle can be connected to rotation center. And the center never rotates with the field it creates.
- Older explanation is that Moon is too small for rotation.

Could Moon miss the rotational center :
- Soviets said : We have two satellites, which rotates around the moon. We have photos from the satellites.
- Americans said : Apollo 11 rolled around moon, with moon's rotational power. We have photos and videos from the dark side.

All moons must have at least gravitational drag, otherwise moon cannot exist. Gravitational drag keeps the moon in one piece. All natural balls, big and small, should have gravitational drag. Drag creates ball like shape to the object.

- - Threads - -

In wider level flow's thread sizes and density must follow the universes size. Flow needs holes for penetration. Our flows either hits the particle, or passes it through the holes. Atom level flows do not show in our world. 

Universe / space cannot have many Avatar movie like natural impenetrable walls. Avatar movie's floating rocks have a leaking impenetrable drag walls / shields at the bottom or inside the rocks. That's why they floated in the air.

- - Drag wall - -

The drag wall is likely to born, when the ball starts to redirect the thread, so that it passes the impenetrable ball. As long as the ball grows, other threads has to bend with the passing thread, the pressure grows. After the thread passes the ball, other threads start to push the thread back to original track, with the earlier pressure. This back-pressure pushes balls against the flow. After first collision slowness starts to increase the back-pressure and the movement accelerates. With the time, the disturbance in the flow spreads farther from the disturbing ball. Spreading increases the force, with what the flow pushes ball towards the center.

The impenetrable ball cannot stop the thread. If ball would stop the thread, it would develop resisting force in front of the ball. Ball would either stay in it's place, fall slowly or raise with the flow. Capability to bend is unique to flows and their threads. Bigger wave stops and changes direction in the same situation ... hits it's head to the wall and goes away. 

Due to bending capability it is not very likely, that flows would have a visible wave format. Collisions with balls would make a mess from the wave format. Each collision would make permanent changes to flow. Possibly change it's behavior. If flows have a separation system, collisions would make a mess from wave oriented separation.

If you can stop the flow, the outgoing flow creates pressure under the impenetrable object. Object starts to raise with flow's power. Flow naturally leaks from sides. No idea what happens to the hole after the shield. If threads act like heat, the flow closes the hole. Light wave like behavior would leave the hole open.

Magnets' drag should work like gravitational drag.

- - Rotational collision - -

In tilted rotational collision the threads' pressure changes in the front and back. Balls jump from one thread to another. Track keeping is possible only if the front and back forces are always equal. In tilted flow the next thread resists the jump, stabilizes the speed. In common collision angle is significant for balance. But when flow goes around the ball, surrounding flows pushes the flow back to it's original place. The push before and after ball keeps it in track. 

Forces are almost equal, because it is quite obvious that rotational field does not have centrifugal forces. Object in the field is weightless and dragless. Centrifugal force is drag oriented, it increases with mass and speed. 

The rotational flow's angle is probably against the rotation. Negative angle, against the rotation, results into rotational sum vector. When you deal with rotation around earth, you can ignore all the other rotational fields. Earth's own rotation neutralizes these rotations.

In rotational field, zero speed means that object is not pushed away from it's current position in the track. Object moves with the field. With field's rotational force. When object floats freely, the field rotates all nearby objects with the same speed. Air resistance of the freely floating rotating object is also zero.

- - Rotational move - -

In the beginning rotational field resists all moves, which have an external power source. Lock force, which resists moves, is known to be rather small. Nowhere near earthly gravitation.

In rotational field, friction of the moving object is zero. After push it continues to go with the original direction and speed : Friction is weigh oriented drag force, in rotational field objects are always weighless.

The flow powers the movement. The pressure behind the moving balls increases, at the expense of the pressure elsewhere. The flow's balance changes and gets a new stable state. The new state is comparable to drag, but it misses acceleration and dedicated direction. It can point to any direction. It ends only to collisions. A collision with drag field is one possibility. 

In rotational field, air resistance of the moving object is very small. Air resistance is born from the collisions with rotating atoms / molecules. In free air, resistance is known to be too small to change the steady speed. Velocity reduces risk of the speed losses. Voyagers have been cruising in space for ages, without significant speed losses.

Rotational kinetic energy

The form and behavior of the rotational kinetic energy is different from common kinetic energy. It is continuous force, which can point to any direction. Charge can be changed and released from the object with collision. Stable object can be charged with rotational kinetic energy with a push ... energy burst. 

- Push is one form of collision.
- Collisions should slow down and change the direction of the moving object. When you collide with freely rotating object, you got to spend your kinetic energy for unlocking the rotating object. In collisions with moving object, kinetic energies of the objects ends into a fight. Bigger object wins.
- When you fly in clear space, you collide with atoms and molecules. Their resistance is almost non-existing. Much like insects to cars and windshields.

Our kinetic energy needs weigh. Without weigh, kinetic energy of the moving object is 0.

When weigh of moving object is zero, collision of two objects in 180 degree angle always stops them. Locks them into rotational field. Collision in different angle changes the direction so that the new direction is the sum of earlier directions. Since weigh is zero, both objects effect to new direction is the same : Ever heard about the single atoms, who plays ball with ISS ?

Neither have I  : In rotational collision you create a disturbance into stable kinetic flow system. The balance in force gets disturbed. This disturbance brings size and density back to picture. The bigger / heavier object creates bigger disturbance into flow. In collision bigger disturbance overrides smaller disturbances.

In practice and calculations rotational collision is much the same than common collision. Collision forces are smaller.

From the above : 
In rotational field object is weightless in free rotation and free movement. 
Kinetic collision energy should come from the mass and speed :  E = m * v² / 2
- In comparative collision, masses can be relative to another. You can use on-ground weighs.
- Absolute collision energy is difficult. Mass has connection to underlying forces. Distances in space are so big, that forces and masses changes.

? Formula for Collision Energy is Drag field's Kinetic Energy formula. Drag field formula is an estimation, based on experiments. Possible that final formula for rotational field is different from the presented drag field formula.

- - Universal Exports - -

Rotational field network contains an enormous transportation system. It moves things in our universe. Drag fields disables the system. Move disables the rotational powers. Although Universal Exports seems to limit it's operations to rotational fields, it does not necessarily use rotational flows for moving the objects.

If you throw a rock into rotational field, it starts an endless trip. It continues to move into direction you threw it, with throwing speed. Until it hits something. Physics explains the transport system with zero-friction-force of the weighless object.

The zero-friction in rotational field is not equal to theoretical zero-friction.  Rotational field has rotating power. Distance to rotational center, number of effective rotational fields and direction of the rotation should effect the speed. But system works with non existing frictional force.

But, but. Zero friction makes it almost impossible to drop a satellite to rotational field, so that it starts to rotate the origin. Even the smallest amount of kinetic energy would throw the satellite into eternal straight forwarded trip. We know that this is not true : You drop the satellite, field locks it and the rotation begins.

When you detach the satellite, you change it's speed. The satellite and carrier gets temporal weigh from the change in speed. Weigh creates a frictional force, which stops / locks the object or objects. The track locking should take place during the detachment. Soon after detachment both objects return to zero-friction state. Lock obviously needs that field's maximum lock force is bigger than forwarding kinetic force.

Then there is another but. When you travel in space everything rotates and moves. When you seem to travel with straight line, you have to move and rotate with the space's rotation.

If you fly from Earth to Moon over all rotating fields, Earth's rotation would move your ship sideways all the time. Your track would be parabolic. During first 40 000 km your ship would rotate faster than Earth. After roulette wheel, it would be impossible be in moon's track at same time with moon. But on the other hand, in order keep the straight line, ship must follow all underlying rotations.

From the above : Universal Exports seems to operate in the topmost rotational field. It either uses or disables the topmost rotation.

Very clever system. Switch from rotation mode to transport mode is smooth. In transport mode all rotational fields maintain the speed and direction.

Rotational field's transport system is poorly known. 
- It is not known how it handles for example time and age.
- Looks like that it tries to preserve things.
- It is safe and tripping is free from charges.

- Mode does not prevent usage, things can get broke, you can run out of energy.

? My communications were completely down, when I made Field research. Old books missed the track data from probes and satellites. Possible that force weakens, when object jumps from one rotational field to another. It was dropped, because slowing speed would stop some objects into new rotational fields. Then planets rotational fields in Solar system misses clear borders. Without speed sensor system, it is almost impossible, that velocity would increase / decrease with field force. Increase would need that item transports the original speed with it. On the other hand Universal Exports got to have fully automated field selection system.

- - - -

The drag field disables many things from Universal Exports. Not necessarily all. If and when waves moves in drag field with Universal Exports, drag field should disturb rotational flow ... Universal Exports. And so it does, in drag field all waves always die with the distance. The death comes from the drag ... friction / resistance.  See Reflection Balls in sidebar, it is essential for Universal Exports earthly operations. 

The way rotational field works, it is impossible, that our universe would have born co-incidentally. In co-incidental genesis, Earth would have continued directly to Sun's drag field. Sun would have burned and integrated Earth into it. If Earth had missed the Sun, it would travel in space in transport mode ... towards the great unknown. Someone ... something ... must have stopped Earth, so that it rotates Sun. It is so difficult to get away from the transport mode, switch it into rotation : No matter how build your co-incidental genesis, your story always ends into easy impossibilities.

Accelerating, breaking and steering with rotational flows

In rotating field you can get thrust from freely floating objects. The thrust you take from rotating object, must be smaller than the maximum locking force. Otherwise they slip from track, start an eternal trip. This makes small objects disposals. When you search thrust from atoms and molecules, you give a push also to atom, and it goes away. Rotational field never fills empty holes in it, like drag field does. After you blow atoms and molecules away from the field, only the flows and tiny filling material are left.

The strength of space air is not known. Neither it is known, if it can capture loose molecules to itself. The way it allows objects go through is also unknown. All atom level objects, liquids and gases have a strength. It keeps them in one piece. Rotational field does not effect to this strength, it comes from the atom level connections.

Due to the way rotational field works, it is possible that by the time space traveling and rotating constructions clears the nearby rotational field from all atom level and bigger objects ... space air molecules. It is not known if the thrust oriented rocket engines can operate in the space, which misses all atoms and molecules. You can test it by keeping a rocket engine in place, when it is running. If the thrust starts to fade, your engine doesn't work-well in tiny filling material. If the thrust vanishes, engine cannot work without space air molecules.

Lets say, that the thrust engines do not work anymore. And spacecrafts must be capable of flying in the space, with almost nothing. Without conventional thrust, atom level and bigger particles.

- Cruise with steady speed, with current direction, is the default state of moving object.
- Acceleration, breaking and steering needs external power.
- Maximum cruising speed is in practice unlimited.
- Humans and spacecrafts capability to stand rotational speeds is big, but limited. In space there is G force like R force. Quite a lot smaller R, Rotational force, is dependent on cruising speed. First G and R kills you. Finally they vaporize your body into oblivion. Not a single atom can be found from you.

Collision maker

Acceleration, breaking and steering in rotational field needs kinetic energy. In breaking you must create reversed kinetic energy. In acceleration you must create more kinetic energy. In steering you need directional kinetic energy. When playing with flows, kinetic energy charges must collide with the spacecraft. When you turn to left, the energy must come from the right.

You can use long tubes or hide the system into body. To a big hole in it. Hole must be big, because of the slowness of the flows.

You need weigh with what you shoot the body. Change the amount or direction of the body's kinetic energy. The object with what you hit the body cannot have a connection to body. When object hits the body, it should be free from the body's flow system and kinetic energy. All objects in the ship carries the rotational kinetic energy. If you cannot clean the bullets from ships kinetic energy, you got to take ships speed and energy into count.

The required power of the weigh system -. for steering, breaking and acceleration - is connected to the common weigh of space ship.

Flow simulator

Another way to control space ship is to create a disturber of the flow in front of the ship. The disturber system is more advanced, it simulates collision by manipulating the flow. Power demands are at least as big as with collision maker system. Simulator is not as efficient as direct collision maker.

Disturber would take advantage from the slowness of the flow. It would prepare the flow for the incoming spacecraft. 

From this we find a problem in the flow simulator. When the ship is stopped, there aren't any incoming spaceships in behind. In theory a strong disturbance in flow always spreads to surrounding area. With a big burst it is possible to get ship into move. Also possible to design the mounted simulator so, that part of it takes advantage from the modified flow.

Disturber can operate with gas / thrust. But the ship must carry all the needed gas with it. Right after usage it is wasted to space.

Some kind of front wheel-turbine like system is environmentally friendly. Physical turbine changes the flow right in front of the ship. Physical front wheel / turbine should be more efficient and economical than gas/thrust system. Two turbines after each other would resolve the start up problem.

Since the required collision power is related to ship's size and speed, the required energy bursts are rather big. Ship resists the disturber. It tends to continue with old speed and direction.  The new state, speed / direction, gets into ship slowly.

The flow simulators power is dependent on body and turbines/disturbers distance from the body.

Neither of the flow engines can work in gravitational drag. You need space hotels and harbors.

In all space engines you talk about maximum acceleration, steering and breaking powers. Breaking power is the most important from the three.

In spaceships aerodynamic-friction system becomes active, when you change the speed and/or direction. If drag and rotational fields are near each other, earthly principles apply.

- - Cargo ships - -

Maneuverable cargo spaceships are needed with Space Greenhouses. Greenhouses increases the number of flights so much, that a lost ship would be a monthly news. Cargo ships do not need crew. Houses should be big enough to stop the cargo ships. Outgoing manned flight should always be made so, that it ends to collision with the house, moon or some heavy rotating collision wall.

- - Earth's slow rotation - -

Earth's slow rotation speed is difficult to explain. In principle, Earth should rotate faster than near-by satellites.  It is not possible, that rotational  flow would get more energy, after it leaves the center. It is almost impossible, that sun and its flows would interfere with Earthly flows. Nothing in Earthly rotation hints that it would. Earth' rotation around own axle never changes when distance to Sun changes by the seasons.

Drag field / force is the most obvious explanation for slower speed. When particle pressurizes the drag flow, the pressure resists also rotation. And that's not all. When the particle rotates, the drag flow gets small, temporal Y component from the movement. Both bends the rotational flow.

It is not known how and when drag field slows down the rotation. The rotational flow seems to escape before drag field slows down the rotation.

Additional factors
- Rotational flow could be rounded. So that the angle grows after Earth's mantle. And the lost energy would slow down the rotation with distance.
- One explanation could be, that earth's coherent mantle is too heavy for the rotational center. Flow rotates Earth as fast as it can, but it doesn't have enough power to rotate Earth with theoretical optimum speed. Much like the ocean water and air is left behind mantle's rotation.
- In eruptions lava flows out from the inside. This means that there is a breaking force / pressure right under the mantle. It can slow down the rotation.

- - Tilted axle - -

Outside drag field, rotational track do not follow Earth's rotation. Near-by surveillance satellites never keeps their latitudes. Earth changes the latitude it shows to the satellite's camera. The difference is likely to come from drag fields resistance.

Embedded Z coordinate in outgoing flow could be another explanation for tilted axle. But embedded Z coordinate should somehow interfere Earth rotation around its own axle. Earth is said to rotate without interference, equator keeps it's position during rotation. Think that embedded Z would make the equator sway during the day, when compared to sun. 

If Sun's rotational field is considered to be platform ... 3 dimensional ground for all objects in our solar system, Earth's tilted rotation axle is insignificant to sun. Sun rotates Earth and it's satellites as they are.

- - Venus' slow rotation - -

Simplest explanation for Venus's slow rotation is in rotation center. The low angle or flow's force. This needs that Venus' moon and other orbitals rotates very slowly, when compared to earth. Didn't find distances and rotation times for Venus' moons.

If moons relative speeds are like Earth's and gravitational drags are about the same size, it is difficult to find a credible explanation.  If the planet slows down the rotational flow, it always shows after the flow leaves the drag flow. Only the additional factors for Earth's slowness and alikes will do. Although air is thick, Venus misses earthly oceans, which creates big pressures towards Earth's mantle.

Rotation speed around own axle is the 1st bigger difference between Venus and Earth. Besides size and gravity, Venus is built from the same elements than Earth. Second bigger difference is air pressure, which is 10 times bigger on Venus than on Earth. Venus misses soil, during long days sun had burned the soil and converted it to gas. Venus atmosphere has lots of exhaust gases. Venus has oxygen, but it is in CO₂ and so on.

Far-Future

After you find drag flow you can start to search rotational flow. Earth's and planets rotational force is likely to exist in the same space than gravitational drag. When so, flows have a separation system. System prevents mixing in crossing points.

After planets' flows are discovered / confirmed and resolved, you can go down in platforms, to sun's and stars flows. After sun and stars comes the space where Sagittarius A operates.

Then you have to research space and principles of atom level gravitation / rotation. Qualities of atom level flow system and how it blends with our flow system.

After resolving these spaces and energy flows, you know almost everything from the way our universe works. You can give answers to almost all universal questions, your five year old kid presents to you.

- - - -

These researches are important. Understanding and researching the rotational fields is needed when you enter space. Start to plan the intergalactic trips. Flows should exist everywhere in our rotating universe.

From the artificial gravity layers research pointed out, that they are quite likely to be brand new forces to us and our world. They got be tested carefully for safety. The forces must be measured and check, that they do not rip us and our constructions to parts.

---

Artificial Gravity centers, Spring 2017
Fetched with field research Nov 2017 

One way to create gravitational center can be a system, where you combine cores of atoms into bigger balls. This possibility is dependent on the qualities of the unknown gravitational centers. You do not need dangerous radioactive uranium for the creation of these artificial gravity centers. 

In space the most useful would be gravitational carpets and gravitational layers under the floor  / under the construction. Layers and carpets would have multiple small gravitational centers. In multi floor constructions rooms must be high. If floors are too close to each other, the upper floor gravity layer drags people at the lower floor to roof. Gravity center's force field is always a ball. It penetrates through all known things / materials. In space you have lots of space for building large single floor constructions or alternatively very high space drapers.

Horseshoe magnet hints that it would possible to create directional gravitational drag fields. Magnet's drag is dependent on size, it hints that gravitational drag would increase, when you increase the size of the core.

Artificial gravity was the thing I couldn't resolve in the year 2006, when I made Space City plans. Managed to connect black holes and gravity together. Made a conclusion that black holes are gravity centers of the planets. 

When I was in school, gravity was an electromagnetic force. Possible, that I am the guy, who was the first one, who said, that it cannot be true. Came to such conclusion quite a long time ago. Electromagnetism drags only iron to itself. Gravity drags iron, wood and others to itself.

When gravity center collapses the atom goes broke and there are freely floating electrodes. When planet's gravity center collapses planet turns into a cloud. When star's gravity center collapses, star extinguishes and turns into a cloud. 

When it looks like that star explodes, the most likely reason is collapsed gravity center. When star runs out of fuel, it extinguishes without explosion. 

Artificial Gravitation systems, Spring 2017
Corrected Nov 2017 

It is almost impossible to use simple artificial gravity centers as power source. If you manage to create a long lasting artificial center, it produces potential energy. You need switch or shield, before power production is possible.

- - - -

For the artificial gravitational center you do not necessarily need to break protons. Possible that you have to grab electrons away from atoms, before you can push protons together. It should be easy. You use protons which have shared gravity. After you get protons rather close to each other, they should do the final trip with their gravitational centers. It should be much like making common compounds. Instead of rotational field, you use gravity field for making the compound.

If black holes and protons are like I thought, after push there is one more powerful proton in the center of the new atom. After you have successfully combined protons, there is still lot do. You got to develop manufacturing techniques for the gravitational layers. I am almost certain to die, before first commercial layers are available. Estimated that you would get into commercial layers at around 2060.

Current physics suggests that gravitational force of two protons is sum of both protons gravitational force. If proton A has 1 N force and Proton B has also 1 N force, after push these two protons gravitational force is 2N. Without push, gravitational centers are left too far from each other. The gravity never comes out from the proton-electron-neutron system. If the push does not increase radius of the drag field, you can check if breaking the cores would help. When you break non-radiating atoms,  the process is also radiation free. 

Core's gravitational drag forces are unknown. The strength of common compound comes from the rotational field force. The drag tech has commercial potential. It allows you to make very strong and dense compounds / materials. Old nuclear plants for example needs a strong, radiation proof sealing material.

Gravitation center has two components. Drag and rotational force. Typical for planetary gravitation is that the radius of drag-field is quite a lot smaller the radius of rotational field. In gravitation layers, this should not be a big problem. Rotational forces are smaller than drag forces, then you should be capable of disabling rotational effect with opposite direction.

---

Drag Shield, Nov 2017

A simple drag shield has already lots of useful / commercial potential. Shield which stops or weakens the outgoing flow is the simplest/easiest application around fields and their flows.

Tech and principle, with what you make the shields is much same to the one, with what you test and construct artificial gravity layers. 

Assuming that earthly flows do not penetrate through protons and electrons, they are possible rather soon. Shields are made from highly condensed material, which fills the small holes in between atoms, electrons and protons. 

Interlaced spaces are certain to set limits to the thread sizes. Effective thread must fit from the hole, which is filled with tiny material. Material, which is considered to be tiny in the active space / universe. So it is quite likely that there will be a day for shields.

Chances that first drag shields stops also the rotational flow are rather big. After you get more familiar with flows and shield tech, you can create shields which stops only the other flow. If drag and rotation use the same space, the thread sizes are almost equal. If the flows operate in separate spaces, the drag thread is almost certain to be the bigger, closer to our dimensions.

It is not known, what is magnetic flow's position against gravitational drag. From the wave forms we know, that two or more different flows with the same thread size can exist in our world.

If flows penetrate through protons / electrons, creation of the shields with current knowledge and tech is almost impossible. You can set a goal for getting the shields and others to next and non-born generations.

Gravitational flows are not dangerous or very strong. But single threads are very small. So the shield can be thin, and you can make the condensed material from light elements. Weight and size are far from the wall of the nuclear plant. Nuclear plant's bunkers are the strongest constructions in the world.

Due to widespread potential usage, mass production, prices of the hi-tech shields fall to reasonable levels rather quickly.

If you do not remember, Isaac Newton introduced cars to the whole human race. As a real life application for his scientific breakthrough, over 100 years before the first cars were manufactured. With shields you can already make the flying cars from sci-fi movies come true.

- - Drag engine - -

If you can construct a material, which stops the drag fields outgoing flow, you can create gravitational / magnetic machines. Machine has two tubes, another has shield in the bottom. Another tube is made without shield. You raise the potential energy of an object behind the shield. In the shield tube, without drag. Then you move the object to another tube ... to the drag flow, and gather energy with object and it's peripherals. 

With shields it is not very difficult to create machines, which produces more energy than they take. Shield is needed in all stand-alone gravitational / magnetic machines. You got to re-raise the potential energy after you have consumed and gathered it. You cannot raise the potential energy in the drag flow. Moving the object farther from the center takes more energy than you get with the drop.

- In nature, sun gives the power for circling and raising water from oceans to clouds.
- Gravitational power plants are environmentally safe. Small disturbance in the flow cannot result into big catastrophes.
- Drag shields doesn't have to be very strong, they have to be very dense.

Qualities of the outgoing flow are unknown. Possible that drag shields are like flying carpets. When you set the them loose they float in the air. This depends how the surrounding flow reacts to the shield.  If the surrounding flow does not fill the shielded area, shield will raise to air, with the energy and push it gets from the suspended flow.

Drag shields allow you to make flying vehicles and objects, which doesn't need much energy and speed for staying in the air. You can use wing-like rotating shields at the bottom and sides for controlling the gravitational drag and flying altitude.

- - Development time - -

Drag tech belongs to the far future. Field research gives a starting point for the development. Awful many things must be done before drag tech becomes available. Our knowledge about the tiny material, where drag flow seems to operate is almost non-existing. Flow is too small for current equipment and manufacturing techs. Presented drag shields are 100% artificial, nothing in our world can resist or alter drag flows.

Magnetic drag is probably easier and better starting point for the research and development. Permanent magnets exist in our world ... drag center is known and easy to access and examine.

 

---

Electric motor - generator, Nov 2017

Electric motors and generators works with temporal magnetic drag. Electric motor and generator are said to be the same apparatuses. Apparatus can rotate the rotor or create electricity with rotated rotor.

When you rotate the rotor, the anchors create electricity, when they pass surrounding magnets. When you lead electricity into anchors, magnets start to rotate the rotor. System is efficient, efficiency rate over 90%. System works with direct and alternate currents. In principle DC is alternate current with only one state.

After alternate system starts to roll, the output power is rather independent on rpm. In cars alternate generator works with the same or wider rpm range than the engine. Idle rpm and max rpm difference in generators' output voltages / powers ( before circuits ) are small. If I do not remember wrong, output voltage varies in 2 volt range. Older DC system is more sensitive to rpm.

Generator responses to load. When you power all electric systems, generator needs more power for rotation. Electro-magnetic flow always strengthens and weakens by demand.

Enormous generators in power plants shares the auto-response feature with cars generators. There aren't gas pedals and electric circuits which would detect the current energy consumption and adjust the produced power accordingly. Generator leads the power requests directly to the rotating system. Motor to the source of electricity.

- - Auto response - -

Auto response is the magic in the motor-generators and alternate current in general.

When you increase the load in grid, the generator responses. It starts to suck more energy from the rotating force. In principle it is impossible for a straight forwarding electric wave to communicate with the generator. 

The electric flow cannot change it's direction. You can divide and combine the flow with wires, but you cannot change direction. It also known that it doesn't do so. When the load in straight forwarding grid increases, the power source cannot be aware about it. It cannot react to it.

In alternate electric power only two from the three wave components have known usage. The third missing component is obviously power, the length of jump.

Direct Current needs only one component from the wave form. DC form disables 2nd and 3rd component : frequency and length of jump are missing. In Direct Current voltage means everything. In DC voltage always falls with distance.

In alternate current the third component is related to the load. Changes in load changes the length of jump. With small delay new length spreads to the grid. In alternate current, electric power is the length of jump. Just like in sound pulses jump is pressure.

- In auto-response the third component should work so, that when you increase the load, you increase length of jump, and the generator has to "stretch" to the new demand. And vice versa.
- In motors, system would go so, that when the load increases, the jump lengthens, and power source has to respond to it. 

Three component system explains, why big power grids can keep the voltage and frequency stable. These components are independent from the load / power.  System is exactly the same than with sounds and lights.

Side bar hints, that auto response feature belongs to Universal Exports. Light waves and sound pulses never communicates with light-sound source. At least in the same way.

---

Induction, electro magnetic battery, Nov 2017

Conversion between Electric and Kinetic energy is well known and documented :

- Induction is the name of process, with what magnet creates electricity. It takes place when you make a loop from electric wire, and move magnet inside the loop.
- Induction is sort of a two way process. When you lead electricity into same looped wire, it turns the center into an invisible magnet. When you place a piece of common iron inside the powered wire loop, it turns also into a temporal / electric magnet.
- From transformers it is known that induction is almost loss less conversion.

- Permanent magnet requires, that you put lattices inside a piece of iron in order. If you can get a piece from planets core from somewhere, it is possible, that the creation of the artificial core would be as simple as the creation of the permanent magnet.

? Flows, which powers the induction, are services, which keeps this overlying world going and in one piece. They support physical formulas and phenomenal things in our world. Only way to get flow energies into your personal use is to manipulate flows. With for example flow shields. Shields and others makes local changes to the way our world works.

- - Creation of magnetic field - -

Electricity itself never drags anything, but electricity doesn't stay in wires. It radiates a little into surrounding air. The loop creates an area into it's center, where the radiation from one side collides with radiation from other side. These collisions are the most common explanation for the temporal/electric magnetic field. The size and power of the created drag field is known to be dependent on the electric charge, which flows in wires. Size of the wire loop is limited, but otherwise loop's diameter doesn't matter.

In temporal electric-magnet you use electricity for maintaining the invisible core. The invisible core converts the charge into magnetic drag center and field. When you put a piece of iron into field, the piece turns into a physical magnet.

Although magnetic field is connected to electricity, magnetic drag has nothing to do with electricity. Permanent magnet drags iron without electricity.

Horseshoe magnet changes shape of magnetic field. In horseshoe magnet poles of the same magnet are near to each other. This changes the drag field. Core loses the drag field. Drag field exists in between the poles. But mostly in front of the poles. Magnet's drag field can be directed by pointing the magnet.

Energy laws makes it impossible to create power and energy with permanent magnets. Flow manipulation is always needed. Horseshoe magnet changes, but do not manipulate the drag field. The energy you need to ... for example .. continuous bending of the magnet, is certain to be bigger than the energy you can get with changes in field.

Magnetic and gravitational drag forces produces potential energy, the current, existing energy charge is zero. You can get potential energy into use with a change in surrounding environment.

- - Creation of electricity - -

In the process, which creates electricity, the electromagnetic flow attaches into wire. When magnet's flow creates a connection with wire loop the connection creates a small electric charge. No-one knows from where the charge comes, or how magnet creates it. The charge has nothing to do with magnetic drag. Charge goes to wire in outgoing magnetic flow.

When you move the magnet, it creates connections and small charges until the movement ends. Looped wire captures the charges and transfers them to outgoing wire. 

The outgoing charges must be equal or smaller than the kinetic energy, with what the field is moved / rotated. This comes from the common energy laws.

- - Transformers - -

Transformers ... electric ... are built usually with iron rectangles. They are applications of the induction. First you electro-magnetize the iron core / rectangle with incoming electric flow. You do that with looped wires. The electro-magnetic field and charge spreads into rectangle. Then you suck the charge into outgoing wire. With another looped wire. Difference in the number of loops - around the iron core ... says how much the voltage changes. Conversions between alternate and direct currents needs electric circuit.

- - Diagrams from Magnetic Drag - -

When you look at diagrams from magnets, they can be incorrectly drawn / subtitled : 
- Magnet always drag things directly towards the center. Most drawings shows or should show how field develops with distance. Lines should tell how certain amount of drag power goes around the magnet. Like maps have lines from the heights. 
- If drawing has arrows which shows the direction of the electricity, these arrows are not true.

- - The biggest problem with electricity - -

Batteries are the biggest problem in electricity. Electro-chemical batteries are rather poor. Slow and inefficient to charge. Big and heavy. Don't keep charges. Limited lifespan. And so on.

So far attempts to create electric car, have died to poor qualities of electro-chemical batteries. In trains electric locomotives have superseded diesel locomotives, the shift began from 1973 oil crisis. Undergrounds and trams have always worked with electricity.

Increasing number of small mobile apparatuses is another thing, which increases the demand for better batteries. Most from weigh and size comes from batteries.

Seems, that electro-magnetic DC batteries would be quite a lot better. Preceding estimation and comparison to electro-chemicals is attached to the bottom of this page.

Creation of the electro-magnetic charge is easy, the methods and materials are well known and widely used.  Converting electro-magnetic charge back to electricity is new, required thing in batteries. 

- - Electro-magnetic battery - -

Common name for electro-magnetic charge is static electric charge. All objects and atoms are known to have a static electric charge. Static electric charge is comparable to potential energy. It exists, but it is useless without manipulation.

Electromagnetic charges are made by manipulating lattices in iron. When you manipulate lattices in iron, you increase irons static electric charge. 

With magnet you can already reset the static charges, clear the order from lattices, which are embedded to soft surfaces. For battery the clearing system needs induction, which converts stored charges into electricity. Energy laws are cold, when you clear the surface from stored electric charge, it cannot vanish, it must go to somewhere.

Possible ... obvious ... that the magnet, with what you clear the charge, sucks the released charge to itself. If so, a wire loop around the clearing magnet would get the electric charge. The required move would come from the magnet's move on surface. It feeds the wire loop with continuous charge.

Principle is near the way transformer works. In collector the input current is cleared electric charge. Transformer says also that collectors wire loop can be in loose part, which doesn't clear the surface.

The battery needs an operating system for moving the cleaner-collector. Operating system needs part from the stored charges. Energy effective operating system is not necessarily a very big challenge. The operating system needs a starter ... start power.

You should be capable of using permanent magnet for clearing the charge. Electric magnet increases the amount of energy you need for running the operating system. Qualities are said to be the same, and permanent magnet makes system quite a lot simpler. With electric magnet you need a system, which stabilizes the clearing power, by grabbing the additional electricity from the output wire.

The things from which you can compose electro magnetic battery are far from new. The process is reversed from the way you load the charges into tapes, hard disks and SDD disks. Chargeable surface materials have improved quite a lot with computers.

- - - -

Electro magnetic battery
+ Small in size and weigh.
+ Can store enormous amounts of electricity.
+ Keeps it's charges, energy losses are small.

Charging is fast. Output current is adjustable.
+ Theoretical limit to a single charge is the current you get from the grid.
+ You can adjust sizes of the charger and collector systems freely, by the need.

Battery is safe and environmentally friendly.
+ If it gets broke, static charges do not escape into environment very easily. You lose the charges, and that's almost all.
+ Construction materials are not dangerous.

The need to activate and operate the static system is the only major disadvantage to the electro-chemical battery. In return you get safety and time related advantages.

---

- - Estimations from the electromagnetic battery's capabilities - -
October 2017

How much power you could get from electromagnetic battery ?
Don't know. 

Lets say you have 2 TB hard disk. The voltage with what you store data, could be some where near 200 mV or 0.2 V. You need 5 bits per volt, and 74 bits for 12.8 V. 740 bits can be rounded to 10 bytes. With this 2 TB hard disk has 200 billion 12.8 Volt units.

If the current of a 12.8V cell is 1 mA, you need 1 000 cells for 1 Ampere current. With this assumption 2TB disk has 200 000 000 or 200 million 1 A charges. Ampere hour is 3 600 Amperes. So 1 Ah needs 3600 units. After conversion we find out that electric charge on 2TB disk equals to 55 556 Ah car battery. The charge is 1000 times bigger than in common chemical car battery.

These numbers are rough estimations. Even if they were overestimated, there is room for major downgrades. You can get exact numbers from HDD manufacturers.

From the calculations you can see how much  better electromagnetic battery would be. When compared to 55 Ah car battery, 3.5 inch 2 TB hard disk is 1 / 5 from the size and weigh. Possible charge is bigger. Charging of the 2tb hard disk is faster and cheaper than car battery's.

The material into which you store the electricity is flexible. You can even roll the material, just like old tapes and cassettes. Forsaken tapes belong to the category ... holders of the electro magnetic charge.

If you fail with HDD material, you can try pure iron. With pure iron, you need a tech which unleashes electromagnetism from permanent magnet. Tapes and others always have some iron, chrome, etc. inside them. Magnetic material is the one which reacts in all. Unlike pure iron block, HDD and tapes can be charged and cleared from magnetism.

How do you use the electromagnetic battery ?
Introduced bit based battery needs conductor system for stabilizing the output current and voltage. Battery charges stabilizer system, after output voltage / current falls. In tests and prototypes you can use common hard disks, memory cards.

Hard disk never converts the charge on the disk into electricity. It only clears the charges. The electricity our genius ... Mr. Crank ... gets from the outlet wires is artificial by it's nature. It is only created by the charge on the disk. The actual conversion from electro-magnetism to electricity is not going to be loss less. Some of the charge is wasted to conversion. Clearing needs a system, which takes the charges and converts them into electricity.

The system should be based on a small electrical component. You could for example lead the magnetism into iron heart, the surrounding material does the conversion. In the first components you do not have to worry much about the efficiency. Magnetic battery has so much more charge.

Small, flexible and light weighted electromagnetic battery is very handy in small handheld mobile apparatuses. Battery lasts easily over 20 years, it does not leak power on it's own. Don't have to worry about emptying and dying batteries all the time. Possible that the battery and it's initial charge lasts as long as the apparatus. 64 GB Sd Card is very small and light. When adapted to formula, it has 1 800 Ah maximum charge.

Ampere hours and amperes are not kilowatts and kilowatt hours, which are used with common consumption of electricity. Car battery can roll car's around 1.5 kW starter system 1 to 2 minutes. In common units, the battery power is app 0,05 kWh. The 2TB HDD would have 50 kWh.

Hard disk charges the bits very quickly. When file writing speed is 20 MB/s, in one millisecond disk charges 160 000 bits.

When Watts and Amperes are calculated in seconds, it looks like that process creates more power than it takes. The actual electricity is steady flow, which comes from the wire without breaks. The comparable energy consumption for the created charge ... in Watts and Amperes ... comes, when you add all charges within one second together.

Since disk charges bits sequentially, the momentary power consumption equals to the charge of one bit. It is the power, your power adapter has to deal with. It is also the power from which the power company charges you. It is the amount electricity you actually use. Bulbs and electric apparatuses uses the steady timeless flow all the time, just like HDD.

The charges in electromagnetic batteries are so big, that it doesn't matter if the battery would use some of the power to its own functions. After you start the engine or recharge the battery you get all the used power back to it. When so, all you need is small boot battery for starting battery's own system. You can recharge it right after you get the battery going.

In common computer usage around 50% from the bits are cleared. Clearing doesn't need  electricity. Reading is another light weight job for HDD. Even the writing and charging is efficient process, HDD doesn't need cooler.

---

- - Nov 2017 - -

Did you develop the format for publishing these releases ?
Don't know. Think it's a copy. Have a hunch that you can find the format from some old definition for physical phenomena. Cannot say what, where or when I would have read it. 

Electro magnetic battery does not necessarily belong to far future anymore ?
Don't know. All kinds of problems can come into way. But energy laws say, that static charges you create into surfaces cannot vanish. So the collection of the charges and conversion with induction should be possible.

Electro magnetic battery is safer than gas tank. How about electric cars ?
You should unlock ... bailout ... R&D power solutions, steamer and basin systems first. Otherwise you run out of power plants and electricity very quickly.
Any chances to get them unlocked with reasonable prices ?
Could consider unlocking, if you can prove, that in the year 2010 Finns, Web-jerks, midget ruined your all your attempts to contact me.
Prove ?
Prove that they stole yours or some others mails or eMails. Just like those banks stole his money.
Although battery is safe, released charges are big. Loose 10 to 100 kW electric power fries you in a second. Cars are made from conductive steel. Electric car is dangerous in accidents. Old electric car has similar kind of risks than accident car. Water and rain for example are rather good electric conductors.
Good, widespread electric car would need a body, which does not conduct electricity. On the other hand, steel is good material for building the body. So far alternative materials have died to missing bending capabilities ... or to poor strength / weight / size ratio.
Then there is a danger, that world runs out of carbon dioxide. Burning 81 million barrels a day, creates enormous amounts of carbon dioxide for plants and grains.
Sudden switch to nuclear or hydro powered electricity would put an end to massive carbon dioxide production. Results from such switch are unpredictable.

It could lead food production into serious troubles ... what can you do with electro magnetic battery ?
You can use electro magnetic battery in small mobile apparatuses.
And that's all ?
You could replace cars' electro chemical batteries with them ... electro magnetic battery is safe and efficient. 

You can build very big batteries and use them as storages of electricity.
Power plant could build and use a big battery. Store electricity for rush hours to it.

?????
You could build electro-magnetic trailers for trucks. Haul electricity like petrol and diesel oil.
With a small 2TB hard disk you can cruise around 2 hours in traffic, don't you Jack ?
Yes, according to pre-estimation 2 hours is kids play.
No it isn't ... wheels are missing.
Fooled you.

---

You can build big solar plants into space. Store the electricity into big electro magnetic batteries. Use Space Lifts for transporting the batteries.
Why not. In 2006 the problem with commercial space exploration was lack of commercial usage. Solar cell works better in space than on Earth. Earth's atmosphere filters sunbeams. On Earth solar plants size is problem, in space size is not a big problem. Much like greenhouses. Safety makes the batteries' electrical sizes almost unlimited.

In 2010 presented idea of space mirrors, which would gather sunbeams for small plant.

What made you research electro-magnetic batteries. They were supposed to be far-future things ?
Electric waves. Motor-generators and their auto response feature. They forced me to refresh the things around induction, electricity and electric magnets. This forwarded to electro-magnetic batteries. Had a hunch how to build them,  when I calculated charges in a small 2TB hard disk ... before my capture.

What makes reflection balls essential for Universal Exports ?
Universal Exports cannot transport multiple, overlapping waves at the same time. Reflection balls are built over existing theorem. Balls are the only way, an object can reflect waves into our eyes and cameras ... like we see things. Almost impossible balls says, that eyes and cameras must send inquiries to surrounding area.
Radar eyes are not new to you.
Have held the idea in my drawer over ten years. The idea came to my mind, when I worked with forsaken 3D scanners and shape detector functions. Shape detection from 2d photo always failed. Detection failed rather badly also with CAL. CAL has the best possible color accuracy, it is almost equal to light wave's recently discovered actual format.

This resulted into the conclusion, that eye's shape detection system is not based on colors and shadows only. Spent half-a-day for the final conclusions, introduced operating principle.

It would be possible that black-and-white cells would actually be the cells, which sends the signal. And color cells captures them.
They are said to work with marginal light.
If so, what would make vision gray scaled in darkness ?
Darkness creates an illusion from gray scaled colors. Cameras and photos keep the colors throughout the scale. To our eyes, shades are close to each other. Very dark blue- green-red looks the same in our eyes. Easy to check this with common picture editor.
Possible, that eyes can detect the times when reflections come back to eyes. Make 3D models with the arrival sequence.
Draw the pictures in real-time, with the incoming data. Closest objects gets a visible shape first.
And it makes the picture 3 dimensional.
If so, you can never create real 3 dimensional pictures to a flat surface. Like movie screen, paper, display, and so on.

---

When you clear disc or tape, where does the released electricity go ?
Don't know for sure. Guess, that the magnetic field radiates the electricity with or without the surrounding wire loop. With wire loop you can capture the radiated electricity. Otherwise magnet wastes the electricity to surrounding air.

What was deca transistor like ?
It was built with 9 common binary switches. Each switch has different voltage, which activates them. When you lead voltage to it, it leads the current to the first switch, which opens. Switches must be in reversed order. So that nine is the first checked number. In textural Ansi transistor you had 255 switches with 255 voltage levels. Multimedia transistor looped the voltage and searched each number by reducing the voltage after switch. With voltage, which opened the switch. In communications you packed bits by creating voltage ranges for one byte. First byte is in between 0-1 volts, Second between 1-2 volts, and so on. In packing you increase and in unpacking you decrease the voltage.
And it would've resulted to 100 times faster computer.
Possible by the time. In data transfers Deca-system needs to check resistance from the wiring, etc. 10 rooted numbers would have given also other advantages to computing.
Those electro-magnetic batteries were just as difficult.
Static charges have been in common knowledge over 50 years. Induction almost 200 years.
Tapes and their operating principle over 50 years, too.
No-one has searched replacement for electro-chemical battery. There simply hasn't been any.

- - - -

Some sources are saying that oil consumption rose 20 percent after Halloween Hacks.
Wow. Checked in summer 2017, that oil production / consumption had fallen from the last recorded numbers in my financial dataBase.

Could you relate the old R&D Power solutions.
Electro-magnetic batteries remove the need for complicated, unfinished, big tidal wave plants. Then they make the mirrored solar plants obsolete. Mirror plants are good as water pumps only.

Steamer is a system, where you replace gas turbines with water turbines. Water turbine is almost twice as efficient as gas turbine.

River basin is system, where you do not build big dams. You build small basins with turbine unit. The power you can get from dam and basin is dependent on the depth of water. In principle you can build Three Gorges capacity with relatively small river basin plant.

You can also build more than one basin plant to big river. Minimum safe distance between plants is the distance, it takes from float to regain it's speed ... with maximum power production. After that you are free to search new places with bigger falls ... height differences. Turbulences and curves limits the float's speed to less than 10 km/h or 6 mph. Does not usually take long before the speed normalizes.

River basins tech allows you to build plants into long sweet water tunnels, too. The tunnel must be new, designed for plants. If you have 1000 km or 1000 mil long tunnel for big city under construction, you can get quite a lot of power with basin tech. It is almost free and environmentally friendly. Handy way to get additional money from and for the big and expensive investment. 

Then you can hide / tunnel water outlets and inlets, build plants near big cities.

River basin reduces the amount of water or dries the river in between water inlet and outlet channels. Fishes and boats need similar kind of systems than dammed river. One way to avoid manmade systems, is to leave some water into river. Plug the water inlets and outlets.

Solutions are based on researches I made from power plant tech. Dam and hydro tech in general didn't have any existing physics.  The force which actually rotates the turbines was also unknown. That's why the dam plants are so big, difficult to build. The reservoir for hydro plant must be big enough for balancing short term changes in float, only. Potential kinetic energy rotates the turbines. The energy and pressure comes from water height, which is right over the water inlet tubes. All the other water in the reservoir is insignificant for the actual power production.

When you build a plant into waterfall, you use the upper layer as basin. Build turbines at the lower level. Then you build a small basin to upper level, dig water inlets for turbines into new basin. The pressure and potential kinetic energy equals to the height of the fall. Maximum power you can get from the plant comes from the float.

With electro magnetic batteries you can take all the power you can ... from example flooding river. The more power you take from float, the longer it takes, before it gains the old speed back.

Are the licenses expensive ?
If you can unlock them, the fee, fee, fee ... fee could be 0.1% from construction cost. The same than it is with Electro-Magnetic batteries and other new licensed things.

What makes the power so important ?
Difficult to increase welfare without new power production capacity. Most things which creates financial growth and new job opportunities needs energy. Electricity or oil. Most new accommodates you buy to your home have an electric wire or battery. Bigger, more comfortable car consumes more fuel and so on.

When world gave up from nuclear plants and coal plants went out of fashion, the construction of new power production capacity almost died. It has been the situation for over 30 years.

Limited oil reserves have been a well known problem for over 40 years. Looks like that 2009 recession had a connection to disturbance in drilling capacity. North Sea oil reserves started to decline without signs from new major discoveries. Oil price peaked and fell back with deep recession.

Fast growing economies, in for example Asia, have a constant need for new power plant and drilling capacity. After fast growing economies reaches western lifestyle, with current population daily oil consumption raises to almost 200 million barrels per day. Without a proper alternative there is a danger that world gets shocked and falls into recession every time reserves in some smaller oil field area starts to decline ... it is a clear message that the unavoidable doomsday is coming closer.

After liver's process is resolved you can get oil from coal and grain. Space solar plants can be bigger than Three Gorges dam and biggest Nuclear plants.

What happened in 2010 to those licenses ?
After the secondary spilling solution was stolen for celebrating closing ceremonies of FiFa 2010, I had to give up from license selling. Spilling violation opened doors for other violations.

But the license selling was in troubles already before FiFa 2010 ?
Knew .. suspected that web-jerks, Finns, midgets and others would do everything in their power to prevent license selling. Hack and block communications and so on.
I meant that you raised prices.
Yes. Just explained it to you ... Tried to hurry power companies and computer manufacturers with hikes. So that they would act ... arrange and take the first contact, before it is too late. When you have unique, irreplaceable, protected product for sale, you can dictate the prices. The potential buyers didn't have any options for buying the licenses. Until BP, Midgets and FiFa arranged lattices into new order.

In order to work properly FP2009 and the artificial stock market lift-off needed something real for keeping the stocks and finances up.

You forgot President Obama and US Democrats ?
The 2010 license pack was similar kind of future pack than 2017 pack. Successful license selling would've given Obama and his government lots of positive boost. Popularity amongst US citizens. Successful selling would have reduced US governments demand for taking more debt. Possibly prevented the temporal default, which took place few years later.

The only Americans who were truly happy about lengthened spilling and USA's default were midgets ... may I ask how much your sponsors earned from the stock market  lift-off in 2009 ?
Yes you may. I do not know exact numbers. Not much. Every transaction costs quite a lot. And they had to play with limited capital, near to run out of money and lose everything. Estimated that total value of the transactions, during the two week period is somewhere near $1.5 trillion. Quite a lot more than they had, got to sell and buy all the time.
Many banks and others showed big losses after lift-off ?
The ones who sold or were forced to sell shares only suffered big losses. Without lift-off all banks and investors would've shown big losses from the fiscal year 2009. In 2011 there was a small recession. It took place after everything was successfully ruined and demolished. Before Boys gained popularity, the side-effect was born.

- - December 2017 - -

Can you say, from where does the life in atom, and endless levels of universes come.
Philosophy and our current level of understanding. Endless is currently our highest level of understanding. When you start to puzzle with universal questions, you come to the conclusion that universes shrinks and grows endlessly.

Endless is rather new level of understanding, less than 100 years old. Before endless came into our knowledge and understanding everything got to have an end. When I was young, our universe was still often said to have walls. Although idea from endless was already taught in school. Possible that some day future generations find something, which comes after endless.

Isn't it possible that chain of universes ends into godly space.
Of course. But then we are talking about super god or gods. All religions and alikes say that gods exist in our universe, on Earth. Some has already the required super gods in them.

? Answer to Godly Space is partially obsolete. See bounds for our universe, from Jack Answers - January 2018. There is more about Godly Space. Time traveling and 2nd paradise. 

- - Digital Paper, Dec 2017 - -

Electro magnetic batteries makes also one of my long term everyday future vision possible. Started think about digital paper at around year 1990. With batteries you can finally create light, almost paper like displays. Batteries are light and they can be rolled even into a tape. Modern led-bulb oriented display tech allows you to build flexible, bending displays. Components and circuits bends better than display.
- In long run you can fold the digital paper much like big news paper.
- Digital paper is few millimeters thick, weighs more than paper. Weigh is far from current tablets.
- With external speakers digital paper's functionality equals tablets, laptops and desktops.
- With special color pens and brushes, writing and drawing is near paper. Color pens have small color selection sliders in their bodies. Display's digitizer checks the color setting, when you write or draw.
- In the future you never buy magazines and news papers, you buy only contents to your digital paper.

Stand alone paper makes it easy to sell and present digital data in on-ground shops. You can for example show Magazine, Album and Porn movie covers on the shelves with digital paper. The buyer gets the same digital covers with the purchase / digital contents.
- Digital shopping cart system for news paper / magazine like disposal digital items in on-ground shops is still missing.
- Presented music and movies are probably sold on small SD memory cards.
- Boys commercial warehouse comeback is supposed to open doors for SD card oriented on-ground digital sales.

? More about digital paper can be found from Jack Answers - January 2018.